Research Paper Outline Template (With Examples)

A good outline is the foundation of a good research paper. It organizes your thoughts before you write, ensures logical flow, and prevents the blank-page paralysis that stalls so many students.

This guide provides free templates and examples you can use for any research paper.

Why Outlines Matter

Benefits of Outlining

Saves time - Organized writing is faster writing
Prevents writer's block - Always know what comes next
Ensures completeness - Don't forget important points
Maintains focus - Stay on topic throughout
Improves flow - Logical progression of ideas

When to Create Your Outline

Create your outline after:

✅ Choosing your topic
✅ Completing literature review
✅ Defining your research question
✅ Conducting your research

Before:

❌ Writing your first draft

Basic Outline Structure

Every research paper follows this basic structure:

I. Introduction
   A. Hook/Opening
   B. Background
   C. Research Question/Thesis

II. Literature Review
   A. Theme 1
   B. Theme 2
   C. Gap in Research

III. Methods
   A. Approach
   B. Data Collection
   C. Analysis

IV. Results
   A. Finding 1
   B. Finding 2
   C. Finding 3

V. Discussion
   A. Interpretation
   B. Comparison to Literature
   C. Limitations
   D. Future Directions

VI. Conclusion
   A. Summary
   B. Implications
   C. Final Thought

VII. References

Detailed Outline Template

Section I: Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

   A. Opening Hook
      1. Startling statistic, question, or scenario
      2. Why this topic matters
      3. Grab reader attention

   B. Background Context
      1. Define key terms
      2. Provide necessary history
      3. Establish scope

   C. Research Gap
      1. What's missing in current understanding
      2. Why this gap matters
      3. Brief mention of existing research

   D. Research Question/Hypothesis
      1. Clear statement of what you're investigating
      2. Your specific hypothesis (if applicable)
      3. Preview of your approach

Section II: Literature Review

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

   A. Theme 1: [Name of Theme]
      1. Key finding from Source A
      2. Related finding from Source B
      3. How these connect to your research

   B. Theme 2: [Name of Theme]
      1. Key finding from Source C
      2. Contrasting view from Source D
      3. Synthesis of these perspectives

   C. Theme 3: [Name of Theme]
      1. Methodological approaches used
      2. Strengths and limitations
      3. What's been established

   D. Gap in Current Research
      1. What hasn't been studied
      2. Why this matters
      3. How your research addresses this

Section III: Methods

III. METHODS

   A. Research Design
      1. Type of study (experimental, observational, etc.)
      2. Justification for approach
      3. Overview of procedure

   B. Participants/Samples
      1. Who/what you studied
      2. How many
      3. Selection criteria

   C. Materials/Equipment
      1. Tools and instruments used
      2. Software and technology
      3. Sources of materials

   D. Procedure
      1. Step-by-step what you did
      2. Timeline of activities
      3. Data collection process

   E. Data Analysis
      1. Statistical tests used
      2. Software for analysis
      3. How you interpreted results

Section IV: Results

IV. RESULTS

   A. Overview of Findings
      1. Summary statement
      2. Reference to tables/figures

   B. Finding 1: [Specific Result]
      1. Data presented
      2. Statistical values
      3. Reference to Figure/Table

   C. Finding 2: [Specific Result]
      1. Data presented
      2. Statistical values
      3. Reference to Figure/Table

   D. Finding 3: [Specific Result]
      1. Data presented
      2. Statistical values
      3. Reference to Figure/Table

   E. Additional Observations
      1. Unexpected findings
      2. Secondary results
      3. Patterns noticed

Section V: Discussion

V. DISCUSSION

   A. Summary of Key Findings
      1. Restate main results
      2. Answer research question
      3. Was hypothesis supported?

   B. Interpretation
      1. What do results mean?
      2. Why did you observe this?
      3. Biological/social/physical significance

   C. Comparison to Existing Research
      1. How results align with prior studies
      2. Where results differ
      3. Possible reasons for differences

   D. Implications
      1. Practical applications
      2. Theoretical contributions
      3. Who benefits from this knowledge

   E. Limitations
      1. Constraints of your study
      2. Potential confounds
      3. What you couldn't control

   F. Future Directions
      1. Next steps for research
      2. Questions that remain
      3. Recommendations

Section VI: Conclusion

VI. CONCLUSION

   A. Summary
      1. Brief recap of purpose
      2. Main findings in 1-2 sentences
      3. Key takeaway

   B. Significance
      1. Why this matters
      2. Broader implications
      3. Contribution to field

   C. Final Thought
      1. Memorable closing
      2. Call to action or future vision
      3. End on strong note

Example Outline: Science Project

Topic: Effect of Music on Plant Growth

I. INTRODUCTION

   A. Hook
      1. Plants respond to their environment in surprising ways
      2. Farmers have played music to crops for centuries
      3. Is there scientific basis for this practice?

   B. Background
      1. Plants sense vibrations through mechanoreceptors
      2. Sound waves create air pressure changes
      3. Previous studies show mixed results

   C. Gap
      1. Most studies use artificial tones, not real music
      2. Frequency effects not well understood
      3. Mechanism remains unclear

   D. Hypothesis
      1. Classical music (100-500 Hz) will increase plant growth
      2. Compared to silence and white noise
      3. Measured by height and leaf count

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

   A. Sound and Plant Physiology
      1. Collins & Foreman (2001): Vibrations affect cell growth
      2. Gagliano (2017): Plants respond to acoustic signals
      3. These suggest mechanism for music effects

   B. Previous Music Studies
      1. Singh (2015): 60% increase with classical music
      2. Carlson (2018): No significant effect found
      3. Contradictions may be due to methodology

   C. Frequency Analysis
      1. Low frequencies penetrate tissue better
      2. Natural sounds (100-400 Hz) may be optimal
      3. High frequencies show inhibitory effects

   D. Gap
      1. Controlled frequency comparisons lacking
      2. Real music vs. pure tones not compared
      3. My study addresses both

III. METHODS

   A. Design
      1. Randomized controlled experiment
      2. 3 groups: classical music, white noise, silence
      3. 6-week duration

   B. Samples
      1. 60 bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris)
      2. 20 per treatment group
      3. All from same seed batch

   C. Materials
      1. Identical growing conditions (light, water, soil)
      2. Bluetooth speakers for sound delivery
      3. Sound level meter for standardization
      4. Digital calipers for measurement

   D. Procedure
      1. Week 1: Germinate and randomize to groups
      2. Weeks 2-6: 4 hours daily sound exposure
      3. Weekly measurements of height and leaf count
      4. Photos for documentation

   E. Analysis
      1. One-way ANOVA for group comparison
      2. Tukey's HSD for pairwise comparison
      3. Alpha = 0.05

IV. RESULTS

   A. Overview
      1. Music group showed greater growth
      2. Differences statistically significant

   B. Height Data
      1. Music: 24.5 ± 2.3 cm (mean ± SD)
      2. White noise: 20.1 ± 1.9 cm
      3. Silence: 19.8 ± 2.1 cm
      4. F(2, 57) = 12.4, p < 0.001

   C. Leaf Count
      1. Music: 8.2 ± 1.1 leaves
      2. White noise: 6.5 ± 0.9 leaves
      3. Silence: 6.3 ± 1.0 leaves
      4. F(2, 57) = 8.7, p < 0.001

   D. Figure Reference
      1. Figure 1: Growth over time
      2. Figure 2: Final measurements comparison

V. DISCUSSION

   A. Summary
      1. Classical music significantly increased growth
      2. 22% greater height than controls
      3. Hypothesis supported

   B. Interpretation
      1. Consistent with Singh (2015) findings
      2. Frequencies in classical music range may be optimal
      3. Possible mechanoreceptor activation

   C. Comparison
      1. Effect size larger than some prior studies
      2. Controlled conditions may explain clarity
      3. White noise similar to silence suggests frequency matters

   D. Limitations
      1. Single plant species tested
      2. Single music genre
      3. Mechanism not directly tested

   E. Future Work
      1. Test different frequencies in isolation
      2. Examine cellular changes
      3. Try agricultural crops

VI. CONCLUSION

   A. Summary
      1. Music enhances plant growth in beans
      2. Effect is frequency-dependent

   B. Significance
      1. Potential agricultural applications
      2. Understanding plant-environment interactions

   C. Final Thought
      1. Perhaps farmers' intuition was right all along

Outline Formats

Alphanumeric Outline

Most common format, uses letters and numbers:

I. Main Topic
   A. Subtopic
      1. Detail
         a. Sub-detail
            i. Specific point

Decimal Outline

Uses numbers only:

1.0 Main Topic
   1.1 Subtopic
      1.1.1 Detail
         1.1.1.1 Sub-detail

Full Sentence Outline

Each point is a complete sentence:

I. Social media use correlates with anxiety in teenagers.
   A. Multiple studies find significant positive correlations.
      1. Smith (2023) found r = 0.45 in suburban teens.
      2. Jones (2024) replicated with r = 0.42 in urban sample.

Tips for Effective Outlines

Do:

✅ Use parallel structure (same grammatical form)
✅ Be specific enough to guide writing
✅ Include key evidence and sources
✅ Match sections to assignment requirements
✅ Revise as your thinking evolves

Don't:

❌ Make it too detailed (it's a guide, not the paper)
❌ Use complete sentences everywhere (except full-sentence outlines)
❌ Include every source (just key ones)
❌ Lock yourself in (stay flexible)

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Problem	Fix
Too vague	Can't guide writing	Add specific points
Too detailed	Takes as long as writing	Summarize more
Missing sections	Paper will be incomplete	Check requirements
Illogical order	Paper won't flow	Reorganize before writing
No sources noted	Will forget evidence	Add key citations

From Outline to Draft

Using Your Outline

Start with any section - Don't have to write in order
Expand each point - Turn bullets into paragraphs
Add transitions - Connect sections smoothly
Check coverage - Did you address everything?
Revise - Adjust as needed

Time Allocation

Section	% of Paper	Time to Write
Introduction	10-15%	Last (with Abstract)
Literature Review	15-25%	Third
Methods	15-20%	First
Results	15-20%	Second
Discussion	20-25%	Fourth
Conclusion	5-10%	Fifth

Downloadable Templates

Basic Template

RESEARCH PAPER OUTLINE

Title: ________________________________

I. INTRODUCTION (1-2 pages)
   Hook: ______________________________
   Background: _________________________
   Gap: _______________________________
   Question/Hypothesis: _________________

II. LITERATURE REVIEW (2-3 pages)
   Theme 1: ___________________________
   Theme 2: ___________________________
   Theme 3: ___________________________

III. METHODS (1-2 pages)
   Design: ____________________________
   Participants: ________________________
   Procedure: __________________________
   Analysis: ___________________________

IV. RESULTS (2-3 pages)
   Finding 1: __________________________
   Finding 2: __________________________
   Finding 3: __________________________

V. DISCUSSION (2-3 pages)
   Interpretation: ______________________
   Comparison: ________________________
   Limitations: ________________________
   Future: ____________________________

VI. CONCLUSION (0.5-1 page)
   Summary: __________________________
   Implications: _______________________

Getting Expert Help

Creating an effective outline takes practice. Expert guidance helps you structure your research for maximum impact.

The YRI Fellowship provides:

1:1 PhD Mentorship: Experts help structure your paper
Outline Review: Feedback before you write
Writing Support: Guidance through each section
Publication Guidance: Structure for target journals

Apply to YRI Fellowship →

How detailed should my outline be? Detailed enough that you know what each paragraph will cover, but not so detailed that creating the outline takes as long as writing the paper. Aim for 1-2 pages for a typical research paper.

Should I write in complete sentences? For most outlines, phrases or fragments are fine. Use complete sentences if your instructor requires a "full sentence outline" or if you find it helps you think through arguments.

Can I change my outline while writing? Yes—outlines are guides, not prisons. If you discover new insights or better organization while writing, update your outline and continue.

Do I need an outline for a short paper? Even for short papers (3-5 pages), a brief outline helps ensure you cover all required elements and maintain logical flow.

What if my paper doesn't fit this structure? Adapt as needed. While IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) is standard for research papers, other formats exist. Check your assignment requirements.

Research Paper Outline Template (Free Examples)